-12.1 C
Ottawa
Wednesday, February 5, 2025

Predators Act like Butterflies’ Eyespots Are Looking Right at Them

Date:

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Butterfly markings work better when they’re “looking” toward prey

Credit: Mitsuhiko Imamori/Minden Pictures
look like real eyes to predators. Hannah Rowland, an ecologist at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany, wanted to see if the direction of this fake gaze contributed to the effect. Her study results were published recently in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

First, Rowland and her co-author trained chicks to attack a mealworm hidden behind a paper printout of two eyespots at the end of a runway. When the eyespots’ pupils were specifically pointed in the chicks’ direction, the birds repeatedly ran toward the paper and then backed away, and they waited a few minutes before attacking—signs of wariness. But when the pupils instead appeared to look away from the direction of the chicks’ approach, the birds attacked in seconds. Centrally located pupils, though not as effective as ones that peered directly toward the chicks, resulted in longer delays than pupils that looked the other way.

“This suggests that they really are paying attention to the direction of the pupils in the eyespots and are perceiving them as eyelike stimuli,” Rowland says. The concentric eyespots found most often in the insect world, she adds, may seem to the chicks like a pair of eyes that follow them, irrespective of approach angle.

National University of Singapore evolutionary biologist Antonia Monteiro, who was not involved in the research, says the study is a “cool” demonstration of an evolutionary theory for eyespots.

“These butterflies can be encountered from all angles, so having the pupil centrally located ends up being pretty good,” Monteiro says. Still, she says, the eyespots used in the study were several millimeters larger than even the largest commonly found in nature, raising the possibility that the chicks may have been extra frightened by the size of the paper eyes.

This article was originally published with the title “Science in Images” in Scientific American 328, 1, 18-19 (January 2023)

doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0123-18

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

author-avatar

    Maddie Bender is a science writer and podcaster based in Boston, Mass. Follow her on Twitter @MaddieOBender Credit: Nick Higgins.

    Newsletter

    Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter.

    know more

    Popular

    More like this
    Related

    Enphase calls for better times ahead, but Europe is still a worry for solar-power company

    Please enable JS and disable any ad blockerknow more

    Snap sees another bump in its most loyal users, and company’s stock leaps

    Please enable JS and disable any ad blockerknow more

    Trump administration sued over FBI Jan. 6 questionnaires, FDA clinical data removal

    The Trump administration was sued Tuesday in two separate...

    Apple launches app for party invitations in recurring revenue push

    Apple CEO Tim Cook gestures as he poses on...