0.6 C
Ottawa
Sunday, December 29, 2024

The U.S. Debt-Ceiling Crisis Could Harm Science for Years to Come

Date:

Nature

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Investments in research and development are likely to drop—even if the worst-case scenario is avoided

US President Joe Biden (left) has been talking to the speaker for the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, to try to find a way forwards in debt-ceiling negotiations. Credit: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images
legislation authorizing a massive increase in federal spending on science and innovation, including a doubling of the NSF’s budget through 2027. That legislation, called the CHIPS and Science Act, drew bipartisan support owing to rising concern about economic and scientific competition with China. “We’re still in a place where we can’t seem to back up our rhetoric with the kind of investments that we hoped for,” Hourihan says.

Meanwhile, lawmakers are still working through the usual appropriations process for the fiscal year 2024, with Republicans seeking to reduce federal spending to levels enacted in 2022. If those cuts were spread evenly across all discretionary programmes, federal science investments would drop by 20–22% in 2024, according to FASEB.

One possibility is that Republicans and Biden reach a deal to increase the debt ceiling without resolving questions about 2024 spending levels. In such a scenario, the fallback position for both parties later this year could be a continuing resolution that holds 2024 funding flat at 2023 levels, Zeitzer says.

“That’s still better than direct cuts, but it’s not great for the research enterprise,” Zeitzer says. “We’re holding our breath.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 22, 2023.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Jeff Tollefson works for Nature magazine.

    know more

    Popular

    More like this
    Related

    Manchester City ‘worried’ about 115 charge ‘catastrophe’ as £150m transfer kitty put aside for fines

    Manchester City cutting transfer market costs, Pep Guardiola’s uncertain future, Txiki Begiristain retiring and Cole Palmer leaving is not a good look. Send your thoughts to theeditor@football365.com. Good time to be bad Looking at City’s form and the issue of the charges hanging over them, this might not be a terrible season in which to

    Forget the 4% rule. Consider this new magic number for retirement withdrawals instead.

    Please enable JS and disable any ad blockerknow more

    No commitment from Trump team to drop tariff threat after meeting with Joly, LeBlanc in Florida

    CanadaTwo of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's top cabinet ministers...